|
Reliability, durability |
 |
| Cylinder,
piston and rings |
 |
 |
As
it is no longer subjected to piston slap and
piston radial stress, the MCE-5 roller-guided
piston reduces the cylinder wear and distortion:
the piston is not only guided by a skirt,
but also by a synchronized roller located
lower in the engine block:

|
As
a result, torque on crankshaft no longer results
from forces applied to the cylinder by the piston,
but from forces applied to rollers:
Complete
explanation in pdf format (Explain_MCE.pdf).
The
absence of piston radial stress and piston slap
combined with a lower cylinder wear leads to a better
piston and rings durability. As the piston is no
longer self-oriented, it doesn’t tilt nor
lean on the first-land (cylindrical piston surface
located just above the first ring). As a result,
cylinder wear due to abrasive particulates agglomerated
on the first-land is widely reduced.
Both VCR and MCE-5 highly improve cylinder durability
of high-loaded VCR engines:
| MCE-5
and VCR cylinder wear reduction:
|
 |
These
particular features avoid entering into the cylinder
wear vicious circle: the more distorted the cylinder
geometry, the more important the cylinder, piston
and rings wear at each engine revolution. The MCE-5
roller-guided piston widely limits existing challenges
for pistons design:
source: MAHLE presentation - GFC - 18 October 2004
- Paris
The
following graphs permit comparing the piston radial
stress generated by a conventional modern 2L SI
engine (max. power 100 kW) to that generated by
a MCE-5 1.5 L engine (max. power 160 kW):
Modern
2L SI engine: rod mass 570 g, piston+pin mass: 400
g, bore: 86 mm, stroke: 86 mm.
MCE-5
1.5 L engine: piston mass: 753 g, roller mass: 66
g, bore: 75 mm, stroke: 84 mm)


Thanks
to its unique features, the roller-guided piston
of the MCE-5 VCR engine block permits to guarantee
the cylinder durability of high-loaded supercharged
VCR engines on high mileage.
| Crankshaft
and bearings |
 |
In
addition to cylinder durability improvement, the
MCE-5 VCR engine block also responds to rod-crank
mechanism reliability-durability: its rigid crankcase
provides a precise and rigid bearing line in which
is mounted a rigid crankshaft (crank radius divided
by two):
| Gears |
 |
The
MCE-5 gears also respond to most stringent reliability
and durability requirements:
As a result, the MCE-5 long-life gears are designed
for more than a billion cycles:
The
first MCE-5 prototype components that have been
taken as references to announce the MCE-5 reciprocating
mass and to measure its performance have been designed
according to an extremely secure approach: engineers
considered that the engine would operate at max
load during 1 Giga cycles and beyond.
In practice, not only engines rarely operate at
full load, but their entire life rarely exceeds
700 Million cycles (in this case, MCE-5 gear teeth
would be subjected to max load only on 350 Million
cycles because max pressure occurs one time per
720° engine revolution).
As can be seen on the following graph (Wohler curve),
the MCE-5 gear teeth fatigue resistance is oversized
on both gear teeth bending and Hertz pressure resistance
criteria:
In addition to this secure gear dimensionning, engineers
decided to add new security margins when calculating
mass-production costs:
But the most effective guarantee for the
reliability and durability of the MCE-5 gears comes
from their optimal geometrical operating conditions:
contrary to most gears applications, the MCE-5 gears
are subjected neither to shaft misalignment nor
to shaft bending:
 |
 |
Shaft
misalignment |
Shaft
bending |
Indeed,
MCE-5 gear-wheel and racks relative
orientation is not given by shafts,
but by the gear teeth surfaces themselves.
This
is due to the fact that both MCE-5 main
piston and jack piston operate as ball
joints, thus permitting racks' self-orientation
for an optimal gear teeth contact:
|
 |
|
|
Thanks
to this exclusive feature, it is possible to replace
the helix crowning commonly used in gear boxes to
adapt to shaft bending and misalignment (helix crowning
permits teeth surfaces to operate as ball joints)
by a simple radius on both sides of gear teeth face
width contact area. This arrangement widely reduces
both Hertz pressure applied on gear teeth surfaces
and lubricant film temperature:
 |
|
MCE-5 |
However,
on the MCE-5 first prototype, tests have been carried
out for several hundreds of hours at 90% from max
load with gears presenting a longitudinal gear teeth
optimisation. Lubrication was provided by used oil.
But MCE-5 not only provides optimal geometrical
conditions for gears, it also maintains a «pressure
x speed criterion» that remains always favorable
to an appropriate lubricant film behaviour.
Indeed, pressure x speed criterion determines the
lubricant film temperature: if oil flash temperature
is reached, the lubricant film collapses. Combining
high speed to high contact pressure leads to oil
flash temperature. This is never the case of MCE-5
for which:
As
can be seen on the following graphs, the MCE-5 gear
system pressure x speed criterion remains always
favorable to a moderate lubricant film temperature:


| Conclusion |
 |
Reliability and durability count among the main
strong points of the MCE-5 VCR technology. This
guarantees a life span to future high-loaded downsized
VCR engines that is comparable to that of long-life
conventional engines, thanks to:
(see:
VCR
engines’ requirements for mass-production:
reliability, durability)
|