| VCR
profitability |
 |
| VCR:
a new and efficient profitability source for automotive
industry |
 |
For
carmakers, mass-production of VCR engines constitutes
a great opportunity to improve their profitability.
This is due to Variable Compression Ratio performance
ability, fuel efficiency and induced negative costs
(see: VCR cost price).
Indeed, in 2010, VCR vehicles could cost about
1,000 Euros less than Diesel vehicles at
same performance and CO2 emissions, and at comparable
pollutants emissions level (VCR price for comparison:
MCE-5 technology). Compared to hybrid vehicles, the
cost difference will be about 3,000 Euros.
There are two main explanations for the future cost
gap between VCR and Diesel:
On the other hand, Diesel attractiveness will
be reduced by a constantly increasing Diesel
price which will progressively reach that of
gasoline in European countries. This is due
to different political and energy reasons, among
which, the necessity to ensure a balance between
Diesel and gasoline consumption that is compatible
with oil refining industry.
In the future car market context, there is no
reason for selling VCR vehicles cheaper than
Diesel vehicles: they offer the same advantages
for users. VCR also provides requested features
for high volume sales: high torque and power,
excellent driving pleasure, high autonomy, high
engine durability (particular case of the MCE-5),
low-cost per kilometer, good resale price...
Thanks
to VCR cost that will be about 1,000 Euros lower
than Diesel at same performance and emissions,
high profit margin is expected for each VCR
vehicle. In addition, the high attractiveness
of VCR vehicles (high performance, high fuel-efficiency,
high-tech brand image) will guarantee them high
commercial success and market volume.
In conclusion, VCR presents all requested
features to highly improve carmakers profitability
(potentially, several billion Euros per year
for each carmaker). |
 |
In terms of general strategy, VCR will permit the
come back of fuel-efficient gasoline (and even multi-fuel)
vehicles in Europe. VCR will also respond to the worldwide
necessity for energy saving, energy sources diversification
and CO2 emissions reduction.
VCR is not only interesting for carmakers, but also
for consumers, oil refining industry and in general,
for economy.
| VCR
profitability reaches the general case of fuel-efficient
technologies |
 |
The
higher the fuel price, the more profitable fuel-efficient
technologies. From the economic point of view, fuel-efficient
technologies can be compared to some oil extraction
techniques, which become profitable from a certain
oil barrel price.
In USA, fuel price increased from 30 cents in 2002
to 60 cents in 2004 resulting in a great sales reduction
of fuel-consuming vehicles. As US carmakers produce
for the most part high-consuming vehicles, Asian carmakers
have great benefit from fuel price increase on US
market because they produce fuel-efficient vehicles.
Most of analysts agree on this point: oil price will
constantly increase in the coming years. Indeed, it
will be technically and economically difficult (high
investments) to increase oil production in order to
respond to a constantly increasing global oil demand
(at least, 2% per year).
It is then predictable that future market is for fuel-efficient
vehicles. But not at any conditions: future vehicles
also have to be attractive and high-performing. This
is necessary to respond to main market trends:
Source : ACEA/OICA/CEMT, 2003, abstract from AAA database
for all carmakers until 1997,
data extrapolated until 2000, vehicles sold by ACEA
carmakers only for 2001
Indeed,
low-powered expensive «green cars» designed
for concerned ecologists respond to a too limited
market.
In the near-future, fuel-consuming vehicles will not
only be penalized by market, but also by governments.
In USA and EU, CO2 emissions reduction targets will
result in new regulations: in addition to environment
preservation, reducing Fuel Consumption reduces national
oil bill (and trade deficit) and promotes economic
growth (and associate tax revenues).
Regulations comparable to CAFE standard in USA could
be decided for EU in the near-future to dissuade consumers
from purchasing fuel-consuming vehicles. On the contrary,
purchasing fuel-efficient and clean vehicles could
be greatly encouraged by tax breaks and subsidies.
In US, CAFE standard is already costly for fuel-consuming
vehicle producers: since 1983, Mercedes-Benz have
paid $225.5 million and BMW $210.7 million fuel-economy
fines (source: Automotive News Europe - October 4,
2004).
| Conclusion |
 |
Present
context is highly favorable to fuel-efficient and
clean engine technologies.
VCR vehicles respond to all determining market and
regulations demands and present a new profitability
source for worldwide carmakers (potentially, several
billion Euros per year). For this reason, high production
volumes are expected for VCR vehicles.
Marketing attractive VCR vehicles could rapidly lead
to FCR (Fixed Compression Ratio) vehicles depreciation:
the situation could be the same as that actually existing
between Indirect Injection and Direct Injection Diesel
vehicles. |